PDA

View Full Version : Survival Radio 101



The Stig
02-08-2012, 11:48 AM
Survival Radio 101 (http://www.solareagle.com/PREP/RADIO101.HTM)

No idea if this guy is knowledgeable or full of it but thought I'd throw this up for discussion....


Many survivalists are searching for a reliable means of communication
and thus far have not found the answer. Many others place communications
very low on the list of priorities. When times are tough and the systems
currently in place are no longer functioning the survivor must be prepared to
provide this most basic essential for himself. In my case, a reliable
communication system is equal in importance to guns, ammo and a years supply
of food. In this article I sincerely hope to pass on the knowledge and
desire to provide for this important function.

I have read many different articles on the subject of survival
communications and have not yet read one that I consider adequate. Some
stress the advantages of ham radio, some the advantages of CB. In all
actuality, neither of these is the perfect solution. I will go out on a limb
and get everyone mad at me. I have been involved in military communications
for about ten years and I am here to tell you nothing is 100% reliable all of
the time. There are ways to approach that mark though. At this point I must
advise you that the information in this article is presented for
informational purposes only.

First let's discuss some problems with ham radio. The entry level
license (no code technician) allows the licensed operator to communicate on
the popular "two-meter" band it also allows communication on other band but
two-meters is the most popular. This band is fantastic for local or distant
communication, reception is generally clear and reliable. The problem here
is that we are looking for communications during "bad times". During these
times, the repeater networks that the "two-meter" band relies upon for
distant communication will break down from lack of maintenance. The people
who maintain these repeaters will have much better things to worry about such
as where the next meal will come from. Another scenario is that the
government may just decide that they really don't see the "legitimate
purpose" for people to have access to the repeaters anymore (or for that
matter any amateur radio). Ham radio operators would become a threat and the
government will be able to simply go down the list of licenses and shut them
down. Yet another problem I see with ham radio as a survival tool is simply
that the average person is not a ham operator. When trying to gather
information on a national scale, the operator will want to reach as diverse a
group of people as possible. There are relatively few ham radio operators as
compared to the population as a whole. If an operator upgrades his license
to technician plus or general class he will have access to the HF portion of
the spectrum which is useful to the survivor indeed. Communications of
several thousand miles on some of the lower HF bands are routine.

Another option is the CB radio. This over-rated, under-powered means of
communication in its stock form is best left to the interstates of our great
nation. During certain atmospheric conditions, a user would be lucky to talk
one mile. The band is filled with a great number of hopeful Romeo's, filthy
mouthed lowlife's and too many radio checks. I can't even monitor the AM
channels when my children are present due to the language and subject matter
common on the AM frequencies. Some CB radios lend themselves well to
modification. The Uniden Grant LX and the Cobra 148 GTL are very adaptable
to upgrade. The power can be turned up and the frequencies can be expanded.
There are also a multitude of other useful and useless modifications that can
be made to these radios. These are the only CB radios I can recommend.
There are many good books available on this subject.

There is available a type of radio sometimes referred to as an "export"
radio. They may be somewhat difficult to find due to their illegal status.
My suggestion is to buy a cheap CB first, get to know who's who in your area.
The people who can obtain "exports" are there, it is just a matter of finding
them. These radios are technological marvels. The normal CB is limited to
only 40 channels which covers the frequencies 26.965 to 27.405. They are
also regulated to 4 watts of output power on AM and 12 watts Single Side Band
(more on this later). Export radios can operate in several modes of
transmission over a much greater frequency range. Most are capable of nearly
20 watts AM and 40 watts side band. Many also have the capability to "slide"
between channels, thus enabling the user to talk "between" channels so to
speak. There is also another type of radio on the market that is even better
in some ways. These radios are "10 meter" ham radios that can be internally
modified to operate from well below the CB band to well above the "10 meter"
ham band. One of these radio's is the Ranger Communications Incorporated,
RCI model 2950 or it's more powerful big brother the model 2970. These
radios have a frequency range of 26 MHz to 31.999 MHz (with a very simple
modification) although most users stay within 26.000 to 27.999 for safety.
The "10-meter" ham band begins at 28 MHz, don't mess around up there. Most
of these radios are mobile radios; in order to use one as a base station a
power supply is required to convert 120 vac to 13.8 vdc. I would recommend
at least a 6 Amp power supply for an "export" or Ranger. Good power supplies
cost about $75.00 or less. There are also some export and 10 meter base
stations available which plug directly into a wall. I feel that some
versatility is lost because a mobile radio used as a base can still be a
mobile if necessary. A walkie-talkie or two would also be useful when on
foot. Although normally range is limited, when communicating with a base
station they are capable of a surprising distance. An export walkie-talkie
exists that can transmit and receive on the same frequencies as the other
export radios.

Now, let's get back to that Side Band statement that I made. If you
could look at the signal generated by the average CB radio it could be
described as having three layers. The two outside layers are the Single
Side Bands (SSB) and the middle is the carrier wave. When the microphone is
keyed on an AM CB radio a carrier wave is emitted from the radio, this
carrier is there whether you talk or not just wasting power. On a side band
radio, the carrier and one of the side bands is eliminated thus concentrating
more power into a narrower signal. These side bands are referred to as the
upper side band (USB) and the lower side band (LSB). Some CB radios are
capable of side band communication but, are still restricted to the 40
channels of the radio. Even with this limitation a CB equipped for side band
in effect, gives you 80 side band channels and 40 AM channels to choose from.
Within the CB band, most side band communication is on the LSB of channels
35-40. Outside the CB band, many people use the frequency 27.5550 USB as a
long distance call frequency. This frequency is located in the so-called
"freeband" which extends from 27.4150 to 27.9990, this frequency band is an
area of spectrum which is used very little by the primary users. Much of the
best side band long distance communication takes place in this area.

Side-banders as they are commonly referred to are a different breed
entirely that the AM operator. They have a protocol for operating that makes
the side bands a much more pleasant place to communicate. These people are
usually very knowledgeable about equipment and also sources of "the good
stuff" especially when talking about free-banders. On the sidebands, the use
of a "handle" is taboo. They normally identify themselves with a three or
four digit number. These numbers can be obtained through sideband
organizations or, if like me you want to stay off the lists, just make one
up. Having a number will give you credibility so other sidebanders will talk
to you. Another major difference between SSB operation and AM operation is
the use of "Q" codes instead of "10" codes. If an operator tries to use the
"10" codes on SSB he will usually be in for a ribbing and, told to go back to
AM. A complete listing of the international "Q" codes will be available in
any book about beginning Ham radio. The best advice I can give is to monitor
the side bands, see how they operate and when you have it down make your
first contact. Another good idea is to find a local sidebander or freebander
and treat him like a brother. This person can guide your decisions and
prevent some very expensive mistakes. He will also be able to relate to you
information which is not available in print.

The antenna is the most important part of the system. Within the
myriad of mobile antennas, all of my research has led me to one antenna that
is worthy of consideration. This is the Wilson 1000 antenna. This antenna
can handle up to 3000 watts of power and can be purchased in three different
configurations; a magnetic mount, a hardmount (a hole must be drilled in the
vehicle) and a trunk lip mount. This antenna transmits and receives better
that any whip antenna I have ever seen or used. Since it is simply a thin,
steel whip, it is unobtrusive as well. They may seem a little pricey at
first but, the advantages gained in performance, durability and lack of
maintenance more than make up for the costs. I have personally talked from
the Southwestern United States to Alaska from my car with one of these
antennas. An alternative to the Wilson 1000 is the Wilson Trucker 2000.
This antenna will handle 3500 watts of power and is essentially the same as
the 1000. The primary difference being the type of mounting hardware
necessary. It is sometimes a better choice for vehicles where a roof top
mount is not desired or possible as it will mount to mirrors or the body or
anywhere that you can fasten a standard 3/8 by 24 pitch antenna mount.

Regarding base station antennas you have two types to choose from: The
beam antenna and the vertical element. My choice is to use both through the
use of a switch box. The vertical element is better for local communications
and, the beam is better for long distances. Many times an operator is able
to talk to a distant station that would otherwise be unheard without the use
of a beam. The beam antenna is mounted on a rotor which is controlled by a
control box next to the radio. The operator simply rotates the beam until
the best signal is received. The vertical element antenna is better for
local communications because the radiation pattern into and out of the
antenna is omni-directional. The beam will only receive and transmit in the
direction it is pointed. Beams are designed to multiply the transmit and
receive strength and are said to have a higher "gain". Whichever type of
antenna you use, it is important to securely ground the mast. I use a
minimum of 8 feet of steel or copper ground rod driven into the earth and
connected to the mast with 8 gauge wire or copper braid. Make sure all
clamps are tight. Popular brands for base antennas are Maco and Moonraker.
The Solarcon A-99 is a very good omni-directional as is the V58 by Maco.
Whenever an Omni is used make sure to include the ground plane radials.
These extend out from the base of the antenna and increase the efficiency
dramatically.

An important area of concern for the radio operator is a term called
Standing Wave Ratio (SWR). This is simply the amount of output power being
reflected back into the radio. The higher the SWR the less efficiently your
equipment is functioning. If the SWR is too high you will eventually cook
your radio. An SWR reading of 2.0 or less is generally considered
acceptable, this number should be as low as possible. Anything 3.0 or higher
will eventually damage valuable equipment. The SWR is adjusted with the
antenna, usually by sliding the radiating element in or out of an adjusting
sleeve or by trimming the radiating element. In any case, follow the
manufacturers directions or seek the advice of an experienced operator. The
coax which connects the radio to the antenna to the radio is very important
and deserves mention. In order to achieve an efficient system a good quality
coax should be used at the minimum I would recommend using MINI 8/U or RG-8/U
if the diameter is not a problem. The very best money can buy is called
RG-213/U. It is almost a half inch in diameter and well worth the money. It
isn't too terribly expensive at about $30.00 for 50 feet. The others are
substantially less. Operators using a linear amplifier need to be unusually
careful of a high SWR.

A linear amplifier can significantly increase the operating distance of
a radio. These amplifiers are used to boost the power of an outgoing signal
as high as the operator's budget will allow. I have heard it said that
amplifiers normally cost about a dollar a watt; I think this estimate is too
high. The average I would recommend for a reliable system is about 500
watts. This power will increase local reliability by allowing communication
over the "skip" coming in and also allow you to talk very clearly to out of
state or even out of country stations when skip conditions are good. When
skip conditions are favorable Channel 6 (27.0250 MHz) on the CB band is a
very good example of the benefits of a linear amplifier. Many of these
stations, even from thousands of miles away, will sound like they are in
your back seat. Most of the stations on channel 6 are running 1000 watts or
more.

Skip is an atmospheric condition in which your signal can travel
thousands of miles and reach a distant station. For the SSB operator, skip
is pretty reliable. On any given day an operator should be able to talk out
of state to somewhere. Sometimes this condition will last only a few hours
but, it happens almost every day. Skip occurs on the AM band as well but, it
fades in and out so fast that meaningful conversations are almost
nonexistent. I have had or heard many conversations on side band which lasted
an hour or more. Atmospheric skip makes the radio a good source of
information on a national scale. This oversight probably has the FCC fuming
but, there is an unenforceable law which states that it is illegal to attempt
to make contact with another station that is over 150 miles away in the
Citizens Band. Even a totally stock, out of the box CB has the capability to
make contact with other states occasionally.

There is currently a government agency called the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC), which regulates and enforces all forms of
inter-communication in the United States. These people are to free
communication what the BATF is to firearms. Two-way communication is only
legal through strict government guidelines. The very nature of the "ham
license" only adds to the "law and order" society which the bureaucrats want
to create. This licensing process is simply a means of keeping tabs on
two-way communication. Nazi Germany was also interested in controlling
communication as are all totalitarian regimes. In many countries simply
possessing a means of two-way communication is as serious of an offense as
possession of an unauthorized gun. Don't worry though, "it can't happen
here, the republicans are here to save us".

The situation we find ourselves in now in the United States is becoming
more precarious each day. The Republican revolution, for the most part, has
turned into just another scam on the American people. Our currency is
teetering on the brink of collapse. The committed survivor must be prepared
to provide this important asset to his family or group. One day when you
pick up your "cell-phone" and nothing happens what will you do? Hopefully
you will just reach down and turn on the radio, but if you don't have one...

Gunfixr
02-08-2012, 02:44 PM
This is the one area of comms I have some knowledge about. I knew pretty much all said there.
I used to talk on one of those "export" radios all the time, on the sidebands, well above channel 40.
I wonder where that radio went to?

austinrob
02-08-2012, 04:21 PM
he needs to loosen the tinfoil with respect to the FCC going down the list of operators and "shutting them down". I don't see that happening. And no license is required to own the equipment, only to legally transmit. So if they come to my door, they get an HT, and an old boat anchor HF radio. Who knows what I have stashed in the attic, or at the hunting cabin, or at a friends place. I still think licensed amateur radio, general class, HF bands, is the best option for long distance comms.

2m/70cm are good options for localized comms, know the simplex frequencies in use in your area or with friends because as alluded to, repeaters are not a reliable resource. Any decent emergency comms group will have one or 2 backup repeaters as well as simplex frequencies predetermined with relay of traffic worked out to more distant folks.

bacpacker
02-08-2012, 11:19 PM
I wasn't aware of the Export radio's. Sounds like that might be worth looking at, but you are still much more limited in frequencies than hams are.

The author did make 2 really important points (more than that, but 2 in particular). Antenna's and coax. It really don't matter how much power you run, if you have shitty coax or a garbage antenna your signal will not get out nearly as well as it would with a properly matched coax and high gain antenna.

Stg1swret
02-09-2012, 01:11 AM
He is also wrong about SWR. Any SWR higher then 1.5 will cause issues. And it doesn't take a lot of transmit power to reach out there either. A 1 watt transmitter with the proper antenna, and a low SWR can reach the moon. SWR (standing wave ratio) can be gotten down to almost 0. I've work for enough communication companies to know. the 2 meter band is easy to match and get low. Try getting the 2-18Ghz band to less then, .5 acrossed the band.

bacpacker
02-09-2012, 02:05 AM
Good points all Stg.

austinrob
02-09-2012, 04:38 AM
He is also wrong about SWR. Any SWR higher then 1.5 will cause issues.

what is your experience with higher SWR ratings? I've worked this hemisphere on 10m & 20m phone using a home built antenna with SWR ranging from 1:1flat to 3. Depending on who you speak with (including some of the engineers at QST magazine) the optimal SWR for a 1/4wave vertical is 1.52.

Sure, higher SWR can mean you're not radiating as well as you might be with a better matched system, but as long as I'm below 3 I'm not too concerned. I have better luck below 2. And modern transceivers start to ramp down the power above a 4:1 SWR to avoid damage.

I see no problems with the SWR advice above. Lower is better, keep it below 3, below 2 is better. Below 1.5 is even better sure, but I see no cause for concern if my SWR is 2.

And yes, you can do a lot with QRP. I know guys working 1w QRP from mountaintops using backpacking rigs. Also hearing of 1/2w QSO with the ISS isn't abnormal.

Just like a rifle depending on how good the scope is, a transceiver depends on how good the antenna system is (includes feedline).

Stg1swret
02-09-2012, 09:27 PM
Having worked in the communications and electronics field since 1970, I can tell you that SWR should always be aslow as possible. An antenna can be tuned to lower SWR, wave guides can be tuned to do the same as can connectors. I've even seen how transmission wires are run affect the swr that is measured. That being said , SWR should be checked from time ti o time even in an established set up , keep it as low as possible. Once you get much over 1.5 you have degradation of both transmitt and receive power.

austinrob
02-10-2012, 12:57 AM
I don't doubt anything you say. I'm not trying to start a pissing contest. I just know that I can make 5000+mile contacts on 10m & 20m with SWR ranging as high as 3. Old timers in the local club were working the world on untuned random wire long before I was born and long before they had a wattmeter to tune with. SWR has an effect, but you're not going to burn out your finals with an SWR of 2

Definitely right on checking periodically. My homebrew antenna is on the roof, and strung into the trees behind the house. I noticed the wattmeter reading differently one night... the twine I had the antenna secured in the tree with had broken and I had a drooping end. Paracord replacement, and no more problem.

I was also surprised by how much a ferrite torroid on the feedline (to reduce noise) changed things. (both with respect to static AND with the SWR)

Stg1swret
02-10-2012, 01:03 AM
There are a ton of little things that can affect signal strength, SWR, etc. It all depends on what wave length you are transmitting and receiving on. Had a friend who couldn't figure out why his CB didn't work well, until we looked at his cable going to his antennae. he decided to dress it up nice and neeat. Sharp 90 degree bends do not aid in xmit/rcv of any signal.

Gunfixr
02-10-2012, 03:40 AM
How many problems you have with higher SWRs is directly related to you power output levels. SWRs is the ratio of power going out of the antenna to the power going right back into the transmitter. The higher the SWRs, the more of your output power that is returning to the radio. With a high enough output power, and high SWRs, you can burn the finals right out of the radio.
You can get away with 2.0 or higher at low wattage, but crank up the power, and the radio is toast.
When I was running an export radio, it was modulation driven to about 35 watts, driving a 200+ watt linear, and I wouldn't have SWRs above 1.0, and .5 was preferred.
You must understand that SWR changes across the channel range, going up or down as you go up or down the Mhz range, as the antenna will only closely match a certain Mhz range. I used to set my SWR at the channel I used the most, or if using many channels, do an "average" setting.

Gunfixr
02-10-2012, 04:05 AM
It can matter what antenna and coax you use, depending on the power outputs. Once you get over 500watts of power it starts to become important, once you pass 1000 watts, it'd better be right, or there will be a catastrophic failure. It just be a matter of the radio or the antenna/coax.
I had a friend burn his coax completely up trying to transmit in a tunnel, running about 3000 watts. It was all quality equipment, but tunnels are bad news for transmitting.

As far as channels go, the radio I had was a President Grant. It had channels 1-40 on AM, USB, LSB, and FM. It then also had a Low and Hi settings, where there was an additional 1-40 channels that went up to regular channel 1 on Low, and then went from 1 to 40 starting above regular 40 on High, on all of mentioned bands. That gives a total of 480 channels. I had had the clarifier "opened", to allow it to slide in between channels. It would "slide" about a channel and a half, giving it almost unlimited channels in between the top and bottom channels.
As for the FCC, well it is actually illegal to use an "export" radio, or to transmit on any channels other than AM, USB, or LSB, or any channels below or above the 1-40 range without proper licensing. It is also illegal to transmit more than 4 watts of power. If caught, they usually cut the coax, and take everything hooked to it besides the antenna. Lately, the FCC has been severely gutted financially, and isn't doing a whole lot anymore. Also, they only come if an official complaint is lodged, meaning a real report. If your neighbor calls them on the phone and bitches, that's not good enough, they gotta go down and file a complaint.
I'm not suggesting that anybody disregard the law, only how the system works in this area.
I have talked all the way across the country with the above mentioned setup, from a pickup truck. When I sold the truck, I took it all out, and most got sold.

bacpacker
02-11-2012, 12:02 AM
One way to get around not so good SWR is to run a tuner between the radio and antenna. Be sure you match it to the power level your running. This will allow you to use an antenna that is not match properly to the frequency your using.
I picked up a LDG model like this Products LDG Electronics (http://www.ldgelectronics.com/c/252/products/7/8/1)

I works well up to 100 watts. I don't use an amp so this works well for me.

alpmco
02-28-2012, 05:13 PM
So was it a CB write up? He pretty much glossed over all the other methods of communications. I didn't really see any flaws in what was written. 10-4 on the antenna being key to getting out. Most modern radios detect when the SWR is high and automatically cut power to reduce the chance of a burn out. Sometimes I happy to get a 3:1 SWR. A tuner brings that down but its best to have the antenna set up right to start with.
As for the radio ... if you are an experienced amateur you have probably already figured out how to do a MARS mod on your rig. My HF equipment is wide open on transmit across most to the HF spectrum. Although it is illegal for me to TX outside the amateur bands, or even use it in the CB range (who would know?) the rules allow for transmission on any frequency in an emergency situation. So I've opened it up in anticipation that one day I may need it.
CB has it's use but why not cover all bases? Consider max/min usable frequencies for time of day and solar conditions. Ducting in the VHF/UHF range ... Ive talked 60 - 80 miles on a 5 watt HT on 2M on rare occasions.
Don't discount being a SWL either. Communications don't have to be two way. I've been a short wave listener since I built my first radio kit back in the early 70's. Even now I spend 98% of my time just listening to others hams, MilComs and the dwindling shortwave propaganda broadcasts. Oh! lets not forget Brother Stair over at the Overcomer Ministry! :) Lots can be learned by just keeping your mouth shut and in turn not giving your position away.

alpmco
02-28-2012, 05:23 PM
One way to get around not so good SWR is to run a tuner between the radio and antenna. Be sure you match it to the power level your running. This will allow you to use an antenna that is not match properly to the frequency your using.
I picked up a LDG model like this Products LDG Electronics (http://www.ldgelectronics.com/c/252/products/7/8/1)
I have a couple of the LDG tuners too. They help match the antenna to the rig but keep in mind if the antenna is not matched correctly the tuner eats up the signal so as to protect your rig.

bacpacker
02-29-2012, 12:15 AM
You are exactly right on the tuner Alpmco.
Great point about opening up the radio's to receive everything. That is on my to do list for every radio I have.
Listening to the freq's is far and away the best way to learn proper operating procedures, espically if you can listen to exercises or emergency comms.