PDA

View Full Version : Ruskie Akula Class Sub operates in Carribean Undetected



apssbc
08-15-2012, 02:15 PM
This scares me a little. Why didnt we catch this sub that operated in the Carribean for a month? The Russians led by Putin are really trying to push their power abroad. He has said he wants to go back to some cold war policies. Do I think the Russians can take us, no. However with them and the Chineese expanding and creating blue water navies we would be in for a real fight. The recent developments of all of these countries against us and unlike us they wont back down. Hell our boys in bases all over the world are surrounded by potential enemies. We have enemies all around us in South America, Russia, China, the Middle East, ect. These are scary times we live in.

http://freebeacon.com/silent-running/

BY: Bill Gertz
August 14, 2012 5:00 am

A Russian nuclear-powered attack submarine armed with long-range cruise missiles operated undetected in the Gulf of Mexico for several weeks and its travel in strategic U.S. waters was only confirmed after it left the region, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.

It is only the second time since 2009 that a Russian attack submarine has patrolled so close to U.S. shores.

The stealth underwater incursion in the Gulf took place at the same time Russian strategic bombers made incursions into restricted U.S. airspace near Alaska and California in June and July, and highlights a growing military assertiveness by Moscow.

The submarine patrol also exposed what U.S. officials said were deficiencies in U.S. anti-submarine warfare capabilities—forces that are facing cuts under the Obama administration’s plan to reduce defense spending by $487 billion over the next 10 years.

The Navy is in charge of detecting submarines, especially those that sail near U.S. nuclear missile submarines, and uses undersea sensors and satellites to locate and track them.

The fact that the Akula was not detected in the Gulf is cause for concern, U.S. officials said.

The officials who are familiar with reports of the submarine patrol in the Gulf of Mexico said the vessel was a nuclear-powered Akula-class attack submarine, one of Russia’s quietest submarines.

A Navy spokeswoman declined to comment.

One official said the Akula operated without being detected for a month.

“The Akula was built for one reason and one reason only: To kill U.S. Navy ballistic missile submarines and their crews,” said a second U.S. official.

“It’s a very stealthy boat so it can sneak around and avoid detection and hope to get past any protective screen a boomer might have in place,” the official said, referring to the Navy nickname for strategic missile submarines.

The U.S. Navy operates a strategic nuclear submarine base at Kings Bay, Georgia. The base is homeport to eight missile-firing submarines, six of them equipped with nuclear-tipped missiles, and two armed with conventional warhead missiles.

“Sending a nuclear-propelled submarine into the Gulf of Mexico-Caribbean region is another manifestation of President Putin demonstrating that Russia is still a player on the world’s political-military stage,” said naval analyst and submarine warfare specialist Norman Polmar.

“Like the recent deployment of a task force led by a nuclear cruiser into the Caribbean, the Russian Navy provides him with a means of ‘showing the flag’ that is not possible with Russian air and ground forces,” Polmar said in an email.

The last time an Akula submarine was known to be close to U.S. shores was 2009, when two Akulas were spotted patrolling off the east coast of the United States.

Those submarine patrols raised concerns at the time about a new Russian military assertiveness toward the United States, according to the New York Times, which first reported the 2009 Akula submarine activity.

The latest submarine incursion in the Gulf further highlights the failure of the Obama administration’s “reset” policy of conciliatory actions designed to develop closer ties with Moscow.

Instead of closer ties, Russia under President Vladimir Putin, an ex-KGB intelligence officer who has said he wants to restore elements of Russia’s Soviet communist past, has adopted growing hardline policies against the United States.

Of the submarine activity, Sen. John Cornyn (R., Texas), member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said, “It’s a confounding situation arising from a lack of leadership in our dealings with Moscow. While the president is touting our supposed ‘reset’ in relations with Russia, Vladimir Putin is actively working against American interests, whether it’s in Syria or here in our own backyard.”

The Navy is facing sharp cuts in forces needed to detect and counter such submarine activity.

The Obama administration’s defense budget proposal in February cut $1.3 billion from Navy shipbuilding projects, which will result in scrapping plans to build 16 new warships through 2017.

The budget also called for cutting plans to buy 10 advanced P-8 anti-submarine warfare jets needed for submarine detection.

In June, Russian strategic nuclear bombers and support aircraft conducted a large-scale nuclear bomber exercise in the arctic. The exercise included simulated strikes on “enemy” strategic sites that defense officials say likely included notional attacks on U.S. missile defenses in Alaska.

Under the terms of the 2010 New START arms accord, such exercises require 14-day advanced notice of strategic bomber drills, and notification after the drills end. No such notification was given.

A second, alarming air incursion took place July 4 on the West Coast when a Bear H strategic bomber flew into U.S. airspace near California and was met by U.S. interceptor jets.

That incursion was said to have been a bomber incursion that has not been seen since before the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

It could not be learned whether the submarine in the Gulf of Mexico was an Akula 1 type submarine or a more advanced Akula 2.

It is also not known why the submarine conducted the operation. Theories among U.S. analysts include the notion that submarine incursion was designed to further signal Russian displeasure at U.S. and NATO plans to deploy missile defenses in Europe.

Russia’s chief of the general staff, Gen. Nikolai Makarov, said in May that Russian forces would consider preemptive attacks on U.S. and allied missile defenses in Europe, and claimed the defenses are destabilizing in a crisis.

Makarov met with Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in July. Dempsey questioned him about the Russian strategic bomber flights near U.S. territory.

The voyage of the submarine also could be part of Russian efforts to export the Akula.

Russia delivered one of its Akula-2 submarines to India in 2009. The submarine is distinctive for its large tail fin.

Brazil’s O Estado de Sao Paoli reported Aug. 2 that Russia plans to sell Venezuela up to 11 new submarines, including one Akula.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow’s military is working to set up naval replenishment facilities in Vietnam and Cuba, but denied there were plans to base naval forces in those states.

Asked if Russia planned a naval base in Cuba, Lavrov said July 28: “We are not speaking of any bases. The Russian navy ships serve exercise cruises and training in the same regions. To harbor, resupply, and enable the crew to rest are absolutely natural needs. We have spoken of such opportunities with our Cuban friends.” The comment was posted in the Russian Foreign Ministry website.

Russian warships and support vessels were sent to Venezuela in 2008 to take part in naval exercises in a show of Russian support for the leftist regime of Hugo Chavez. The ships also stopped in Cuba.

Russian Deputy Premier Dmitri Rogozin announced in February that Russia was working on a plan to build 10 new attack submarines and 10 new missile submarines through 2030, along with new aircraft carriers.

Submarine warfare specialists say the Akula remains the core of the Russian attack submarine force.

The submarines can fire both cruise missiles and torpedoes, and are equipped with the SSN-21 and SSN-27 submarine-launched cruise missiles, as well as SSN-15 anti-submarine-warfare missiles. The submarines also can lay mines.

The SSN-21 has a range of up to 1,860 miles.

Baker
08-15-2012, 05:54 PM
I don't think that this is a single event (i.e., this happens a lot). Y'all may very well have known it was there, but someone let the word slip. But, I don't know, I'm not in the loop, and if I was, I wouldn't talk about it lol.


Kind of reminds me about that sub that test fired a rocket off the coast of California a few years back. Anyone remember that?

Brownwater Riverrat 13
08-16-2012, 03:55 AM
Based on my few years experience in the USN I would venture to say that this isn't the first time (in the last 3.5 years)that the Russians have flexed their little rusty buckets off our coasts. We do keep an eye on their toys. Now if they are slipping by as we are being told by the media then maybe our "elected official" has a deal with his fellow communist buddy Putin that we don't know about. We have a member who was a "sub chaser" who might be able to shed a little light on the subject. But in the cold war days (my younger days) we shadowed everything they had as they did us. It was a game, and there was actually a bit of friendship between the two Navies. They collected the trash we threw over the side and we added t-shirts and ball caps to the mess. Next time we saw them they would proudly be wearing them and waving as they came within visual range. "Strange days indeed" Long story short, I'm not suprised and I'd rather we have another cold war with Russia with them keeping the other idiots in check as before. But the days of Human intell and "BALLS" are gone............for now. But with our suffisticated highly intelligent, electronic Navy from hell, I seriously doubt we didn't know they were there. Or we were told to ignore them.....................

Be safe.............the night is your friend.

bacpacker
08-16-2012, 11:45 PM
Wonder if it could have anything to do with Obama's chat with Medvedev about giving him a little space until after the election?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-caught-on-hot-mic-tells-russian-pm-hell-have-more-flexibility-after-my-election/

Maybe he wants to give Russia a little more space? Prep wise, I don't worry greatly about Russia invading the US, I see china being a much larger threat in that regard. They have a lot of people spread all over South and Central America including Mexico. Many other areas as well. They are heavily in Africa. Everywhere they go they are hitting the resources very heavily. I could easily see them building forces south of the border and launching a little excursion to the north.

Brownwater Riverrat 13
08-17-2012, 03:54 AM
I agree Backpacker, I think we have gotten really stupid/complacent over the years and our current leadership has made us extremely vulnerable. Our defenses our spiraling downward, the country's debt is unrecoverable unless we have WWIII. We'll have to whoop everyone's ass in order to get rid of all our debts. I'm sorry people, it's the only way.
"THE ALL AND POWERFUL OZ HAS SPOKEN! PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN"..............Oh I'm off to see the Lizard the wonderful Lizard of Oz!


Be safe..............the night is your friend.

apssbc
08-17-2012, 11:06 PM
I agree with both of you. However I don't think it beyond reason to think that if this happened (which I doubt would) that Russia would help. They have more of a big ocean navy and a history of projecting their military across the world. China not so much, however I do think they are expanding resources all over. I also agree that getting us out of debt would require a massive pile of asskickery on our end. We have a ton of enemies and I think well have trouble fighting them all. Don't forget our forces overseas. Our boys in the sand box are trapped if Iran shuts the straight down and would need to fight to out of the area. That's before getting on ships and trying to cross back to the US.

bacpacker
08-17-2012, 11:53 PM
You are exactly right about that. Not to mention the troops in Japan, Korea, Germany, & England. along with lots at other places around the world. It won't be easy and in some cases probably not possible to get them all back home. To me that is the saddest thing of all.

That's also gonna make things all the more difficult here.

apssbc
08-18-2012, 01:40 AM
I agree. Some we can get back. I think Japan and England is doable. Middle east and Korea will be a challenge. If not impossible leaving those men to possibly fight for themselves.

Here I don't worry as much. There are lots of replacements and weapons. Bringing a fight to our turf would be a mistake. I think we could rally as a country and drive em out.

I know I would get my family squared away and then it would be off to the fight.

izzyscout21
08-18-2012, 01:49 AM
Here I don't worry as much. There are lots of replacements and weapons. Bringing a fight to our turf would be a mistake. I think we could rally as a country and drive em out.
.

I would like to think that, but I just don't hold that kind of faith anymore.

bacpacker
08-18-2012, 01:59 AM
I have to wonder how many would do that apssbc. I know there would be a lot that would, but I could see a lot that either wouldn't fight or would fight for the other side.

God help em though if they hit up a group of Americans that are determined to hold on to our country.

apssbc
08-18-2012, 03:58 AM
I truly think when a situation like that arises people come together. Spirit grows as does patriotism. Unfortunately it's usually short lived. Look at 9/11 the next day flags adorned more houses than I'd ever seen before in my neighborhood. The news showed alot of the same. The country as a whole was gung ho to get the bad guys.

You would see the same if we were attacked. Sure we wouldn't get everyone on our side. However we would have enough. There would be plenty of peace hippies and people who would embrace the enemy and that's fine.

3% it is said actively fought in the revolutionary war to win. In today's numbers if we mustered 3% we would have 9,000,000 pissed off screaming armed Americans in battle. I think that number would be much higher maybe 10% would be a conservative guess IMHO.

No army or combination of armies can beat that. We have everything to fight for. We would win.

Stg1swret
08-18-2012, 10:35 AM
I seriously doubt that the Russian sub was undetected. I've tracked this particular type sub, and although they are "quiet" , they are a lot noisier then ours. The Akula is not all that hard to discover sound wise, but I cann't tell you why. Someone isn't telling the whole story. My job for most of my naval career was finding these guys, and I did it well.

Since no one denied that the sub was there, I'd venture to guess that there is much more to this then anyone is letting on.

Sonar Tech Guns 1st class (surface warfare) USN retired

apssbc
08-18-2012, 07:21 PM
Thanks for the input. I've heard the Akula 2 are much quieter than the 1. Is that true? I enjoy reading naval warfare stuff and have read their quieter. That my knowledge basis :).

Stg1swret
08-18-2012, 08:09 PM
They are, but there are still issues with transient noises from machinery, along with a very specific aspect that identifies nuke powered subs. The original Akula was very easy to find and track.

Brownwater Riverrat 13
08-20-2012, 04:12 AM
I agree with both of you. However I don't think it beyond reason to think that if this happened (which I doubt would) that Russia would help. They have more of a big ocean navy and a history of projecting their military across the world. China not so much, however I do think they are expanding resources all over. I also agree that getting us out of debt would require a massive pile of asskickery on our end. We have a ton of enemies and I think well have trouble fighting them all. Don't forget our forces overseas. Our boys in the sand box are trapped if Iran shuts the straight down and would need to fight to out of the area. That's before getting on ships and trying to cross back to the US.

Right on point on multiple counts. If Iran did "try" to shut the straights down, our current leadership would probably "condemn" it. OK everybody go Eeeeeeeewwwwwww! If, and I say if we did do something their, blockade would be short lived. Our Navy would knock it out in a single strategic strike dealing multiple blows at the same. We're pretty good at that. No sense using ground forces. Moving our troops out of the Middle east, hmmmmm? Not without cooperation of surrounding countries. We'd need the airspace and waterways. Russia's Navy has always been easy to spot, They are covered with weapons antennas and radars! More is better. However, 60% of their vessels can't underway half the time and when they are underway their shit don't work worth a shit. If you can ever get a look at some of their Naval bases and ship yards you'd know what I'm talking about. China, If I were them I would invade us from the Panama canal and from an air assault. China also has over a 3 million man army and would survive a conventional war hands down and that's what I would if I were to invade us. Hell the southern boarder's wide open anyway. China's already established enough Buffets in the US with illegals to establish a pretty good foothold. I (China) purchased guns from the ATF, I got a letter from Eric Holder that said I could. Now as far as our Good old USA is concerned, we'll be spread thin as hell, BUT! There's people like you and me around that would shoot any SOB that would try to invade our beloved nation so I'd say "WE GOT THEIR BACKS". Now me being George "IN God We Trust" Washington, after I kicked their asses I would say "ALL DEBTS ARE OFF" So did I cover all the bases?

OK, but yeah I'm right there with ya!


Be safe.............the night is your friend.

- - - Updated - - -


I seriously doubt that the Russian sub was undetected. I've tracked this particular type sub, and although they are "quiet" , they are a lot noisier then ours. The Akula is not all that hard to discover sound wise, but I cann't tell you why. Someone isn't telling the whole story. My job for most of my naval career was finding these guys, and I did it well.

Since no one denied that the sub was there, I'd venture to guess that there is much more to this then anyone is letting on.

Sonar Tech Guns 1st class (surface warfare) USN retired

I was waitin on ya, At's my boy! Gotta love them Scope dopes! Takes care of us Deck apes.............


Be safe..............the night is your friend.