PDA

View Full Version : US emergency food providers brace as $5bn food stamp cuts set in



The Stig
11-01-2013, 03:52 PM
Original story HERE (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/01/food-stamp-cuts-emergency-providers-brace) at The Guardian




US emergency food providers brace as $5bn food stamp cuts set in

Karen McVeigh in New York
theguardian.com, Friday 1 November 2013 10.35 EDT


Snap funds expire Friday, leading to cuts in the food stamps programme that will affect every US household that depends on it

food stamps Effects of the $5bn in cuts (close to 2bn meals a year) will be 'close to catastrophic,' according to hunger relief charity Feeding America. Photo: Leigh Vogel/Corbis

Inside a three-storey yellow brick building in East Harlem, at the north-east corner of Central Park, a brisk operation is under way to put food on the tables of some of the most needy families in the US. Clients place orders in a waiting room in the basement, or online from home, reducing the need for long lines in the cold. One floor up, scores of volunteers pack shopping bags from giant tubs of fresh fruit, vegetables and other foodstuffs. When an order is ready, smiling schoolgirls call the names of clients and hand over the goods.

New York Common Pantry (NYCP), the city's largest single-site emergency food provider, served 25% more people in the past three months than in the same period last year. It has 200 volunteers to serve 38,000 individuals. Staff fear the worst is yet to come.

"It's a very, very difficult time," says Stephen Grimaldi, the executive director of NYCP. For months, charities and food activists have warned that when stimulus funds expire on Friday, leading to cuts in the food stamps programme, it will affect every US household that depends on it. Pantries, soup kitchens and other crisis providers will bear the brunt.

"We're bracing ourselves,” says Grimaldi. “We certainly know that we are going to see another increase in numbers by the end of the month."

Grimaldi is not alone. Other emergency food providers in the US are preparing for an influx of struggling families across the country who have been warned their Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program, or Snap benefits, will be cut on Friday. Feeding America, the hunger relief charity, describes the scale of the cuts, $5bn a year, as representing about 2 billion meals a year and warns that the effect will be "close to catastrophic".

The cuts are the result of the expiry of the fiscal stimulus legislation of 2009, which increased Snap benefits to provide a spur to the economy. The cuts will be unprecedented in depth and breadth, according to a report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a non-profit thinktank, and they will happen automatically, affecting every household in the US which qualifies for Snap. The US Department of Agriculture estimate there are 47 million people on food stamps, a number that includes 22 million children and 9 million people who are elderly or have a serious disability, according to a recent report by the CBPP. There are 1.9 million people on Snap benefits in New York alone.

Food charities and activists are concerned that food stamps are already not enough to live on and that the cuts – the equivalent of taking away 21 meals a month for a family of four – will significantly increase the number of households going hungry. "What we traditionally see is food stamps are never enough to get through an entire month," says Grimaldi, citing the cost of living in New York. “It will exacerbate what people are already experiencing.”

On Thursday, the day the Guardian visited, many of those waiting in the line outside the NYCP, which snaked its way down the stairs to the waiting room in the basement, were elderly, supported by walkers or canes. One woman was in a motorised wheelchair. Others pushed strollers.

Among those in the waiting room was Carmen Centeno, with three of her five daughters: Jayne, Mya and Anastasia, who is eight months old. It was her first visit to a food pantry this year, she said.
'I live in Manhattan and food is expensive. It's crazy'

Centeno, 32, who lives in the west side of the city, has been on food stamps and other public assistance since a back injury stopped her working for the parks department four years ago. The public assistance she receives amounts to $400 a month, $200 of which goes towards her subsidised rent, $50 to her energy bill, $20 to cleaning products and the rest on children's clothes and other necessities. She usually gets $589 in Snap benefits; she is now expecting to get around $36 less.

"When the food runs out I usually ask my family for help,” she said. “It's hard to make ends meet. I get tired of asking them and they are having trouble too. I live in Manhattan and food is expensive. It's crazy."

She said the kids want "cakes and chips and junk" but she no longer buys such unhealthy luxuries. With the cut, she will swap the red meat she buys once in a while for chicken, which is cheaper. She will also cut out fruit juice. And she will come back to the food bank when necessary, she said.

Another client, Araceli Moran, 41, a mother of two from White Plains, works one day a week making tamales at a market. She said she has been looking for a better job for three years, the same length of time she has been coming to the food bank. Her husband, Nicholas, makes $250 a week preparing food in a restaurant. She only makes $25 in a day at the market, but it is better than nothing, she said. They receive Snap benefits of $360 a week, which will be cut by $20. It doesn't seem a lot, Moran, originally from Mexico, said, but that could buy "a large bag of rice or olive oil for cooking".

Staff at the NYCP say that, based on anecdotal evidence, around 30% to 40% of their clients are low-paid workers.

Food charities and those operating emergency food supplies say they are doing everything they can to prepare for the Snap cuts, from asking for more donations to spending more money, if they have it, on food, to increasing their “food rescue” operations from bakeries and retailers and by reaching out to foundations and corporations.

Charles Meng, executive director of Arlington Food Assistance Center in Virginia, says he expects that by the end of the year, the number of his clients would rise to the level seen at the height of the recession. "There is a seasonality to the numbers of people,” he said. “A lot of families rely on part-time and seasonal jobs to supplement their income. We had 1,500 in the summer and 1,600 now.”
'Every time the government steps away, we step in'

Triada Stampas, the senior director of government relations at the Food Bank for New York City, the largest food bank in the US, which provides food to a network of emergency food providers, says the cuts would take away 76 million meals in New York City alone – the exact number of meals distributed by her organisation.

“We would need to double our output to make up for it,” says Stampas, who expects the demand driven by the cuts to be so high that the food bank may be forced to ration its supplies. “The decision to turn a person away, to shut the door while there is still a line, is not a decision taken easily. But we may see rationing, perhaps smaller meals.

“There is a real risk of hunger growing in our city and across the nation and of people going without and that's a scary, scary thing.”

Grimaldi says he doesn’t plan to introduce rationing yet. The NYCP has already reduced the number of meals it provides, from nine a week a few years ago to 12 every two weeks today. He will look to bring in more revenue, increase rescued food and put in more applications to foundations.

“Every time there's a cut and the government steps away, we step in,” he says. “We will do everything we can.”

The Stig
11-01-2013, 04:23 PM
Original story HERE (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/11/01/Food-stamp-cuts-affect-1-in-7-Americans) at Breitbart


WASHINGTON, Nov. 1 (UPI) -- U.S. food stamp cuts taking effect Friday are one of two stimulus safety-net programs ending, an economist said. The other is extended unemployment benefits.

The so-called food stamp cliff, affecting nearly 48 million people, or 1 in 7 Americans, "may be more of a sidewalk curb," JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief U.S. Economist Michael Feroli told The New York Times in an email.

"The bigger cliff, which I'm surprised people aren't talking about, is emergency unemployment benefits Jan. 1," he said.

The Emergency Unemployment Compensation program, financed by the federal government for states that met certain unemployment and state benefit thresholds, was part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 -- commonly referred to as the Recovery Act, or the stimulus.

It was a temporary increase in the maximum amount of food stamp benefits people could get monthly as part of Washington's response to the Great Recession.

The EUC program extended unemployment benefits to jobless workers beyond the normal maximum of 26 weeks up to 99 weeks at first and later to 73 weeks.

The maximum returns to 26 weeks Jan. 1.

Friday's change in the food stamp program, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, cuts monthly benefits 13.6 percent -- or, more precisely, ends a 13.6 percent increase in SNAP benefits from the stimulus act.

Benefits to a family of four receiving the maximum amount drop Friday to $632 from $668, the U.S. Agriculture Department says.

The maximum benefits for a single adult fall to $189 from $200.

The cuts leave recipients with an estimated average $1.40 to spend on each meal, the department says, citing its Thrifty Food Plan.

The number of people on food stamps jumped to nearly 48 million in July from about 26 million in 2007, before the recession started, the government said.

The increase is due to a rise in the number of people who lost their jobs and needed food assistance, government efforts to increase food stamp usage by families that didn't know they were eligible, and relaxed eligibility standards in some states, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says.

The food stamp cuts -- which are projected to reduce federal spending $5 billion in the current fiscal year and $6 billion the next two years -- are separate from additional cuts House and Senate negotiators are considering as they work out a farm bill. Food stamps are part of the farm bill.

The Republican-controlled House version of the farm bill proposes cutting $39 billion from food stamps over 10 years. The Democratic-controlled Senate proposes cutting $4 billion over the same period.

Food stamps are expected to cost taxpayers $76.4 billion this fiscal year.

helomech
11-01-2013, 04:45 PM
I think it should be cut out completely.

Possom
11-01-2013, 06:33 PM
I agree helo. Cut out completely and replaced with commodities. If they need help I am all for helping but with some common sense. Bags of rice, bags of beans, canned meats, blocks of cheese. They will eat and it will sustain them. If they want lobster and steak they can buy it themselves.

MegaCPC
11-02-2013, 12:18 AM
So where's the savings? Oh right, that money is going to fund some other dumb wasteful program.

ak474u
11-02-2013, 04:44 AM
So where's the savings? Oh right, that money is going to fund some other dumb wasteful program.

Like rebuilding mosques in Iraq. Everybody yells separation of church and state here, but we blow taxpayer money on that... Let real charities run helping the poor, or even better, stop giving money to other countries, and spend half of that to actually help Americans with real problems. If they cut out every person fraudulently using food stamps, (my brother in law included) they'd have plenty of money to help the poor, and GASP! Even help the un-insured with serious health issues.

MegaCPC
11-02-2013, 10:16 PM
Like rebuilding mosques in Iraq. Everybody yells separation of church and state here, but we blow taxpayer money on that... Let real charities run helping the poor, or even better, stop giving money to other countries, and spend half of that to actually help Americans with real problems. If they cut out every person fraudulently using food stamps, (my brother in law included) they'd have plenty of money to help the poor, and GASP! Even help the un-insured with serious health issues.

That would make too much sense. We need the .gov to take our money and spend it for us.

Cutting food stamps or other assistance program could be the catalyst leading to riots and possible SHTF.

David Armstrong
11-02-2013, 11:58 PM
I agree helo. Cut out completely and replaced with commodities. If they need help I am all for helping but with some common sense. Bags of rice, bags of beans, canned meats, blocks of cheese. They will eat and it will sustain them. If they want lobster and steak they can buy it themselves.
That was tried and didn't work out either. There was so much corruption that lots of the food didn't get to the people, and many of the people that got the food sold it for cash. I remember when the govt cheese would show up at city hall the first folks that got the cheese were the city clerk, the mayor and council members, their family and friends, and so on. What was left got passed out to the needy.

ak474u
11-03-2013, 03:16 AM
That was tried and didn't work out either. There was so much corruption that lots of the food didn't get to the people, and many of the people that got the food sold it for cash. I remember when the govt cheese would show up at city hall the first folks that got the cheese were the city clerk, the mayor and council members, their family and friends, and so on. What was left got passed out to the needy.


You spelled it wrong, its Gubmint Cheez.

Possom
11-03-2013, 10:30 AM
You are right about local corruption running rampant. I have a way to fix that though. Every town of any size has it's own post office (which is losing money). Put them in charge of commodity distribution. Ship them in monthly on mail delivery freight trucks. Have the postal workers hand them out at the post office. The infrastructure is already in place to handle it. You would have fed workers handling the commodities all the way to those receiving it. Removing the local corruption.

David Armstrong
11-03-2013, 03:32 PM
You spelled it wrong, its Gubmint Cheez.
No. I realize the racial undertones that pop up (usually inaccurately) with many of these issues, but much of the supplemental food program at that time was directed at the elderly, many of whom were better with their grammar and use of language than many of us today.

David Armstrong
11-03-2013, 03:43 PM
from Possum:
You are right about local corruption running rampant. I have a way to fix that though. Every town of any size has it's own post office (which is losing money). Put them in charge of commodity distribution. Ship them in monthly on mail delivery freight trucks. Have the postal workers hand them out at the post office. The infrastructure is already in place to handle it. You would have fed workers handling the commodities all the way to those receiving it. Removing the local corruption.
Wow. You think that local corruption would be worse than the federal corruption would be? I would think it would be just as bad if not worse.

As a FWIW and BTW, not all the post offices are losing money. Most major sites are still doing quite well. The big losses are the small post offices serving populations of 25,000 or less. Unfortunately that is a very large percentage of the offices, as you say: every town of any size. If the Feds would get out of the way and let the postal service make the changes they want (consolidate/eliminate offices, stop Saturday delivery, reduce residential door-to-door delivery, etc.) the postal service would be back on its feet in no time.

Possom
11-03-2013, 08:05 PM
There will always be corruption. Even with oversight. However, I would rather see a commodity system with checks and balances instead of the system we have now.

People depend on that little snap card to sustain them. In many cases they no longer even attempt to take care of themselves. I think that people would be better off receiving staples that will assist in sustaining their families.

All shelf stable that they can save month to month if there is any left over. Perhaps they could save back enough to prep for a rainy day if shtf in their area.

Katrina
11-13-2013, 03:43 AM
IT may not have worked where you are David but when the company Pop worked for went belly up in the early 60's we got what Pop called the Army Dole. I remember the cheese, peanut butter that had to stirred up in the black and white cans and the funky butter with the yellow food coloring pill thingy you mixed in it to make it look like real butter, the rice, the powdered milk, etc. It was what fed us while he looked for another job and kept us body and soul for 2-3 years, Yeah that's how long it took for him to find another job even back then. I agree with Possom, I wish the Government would hand out food rather than food stamps that are sold for alcohol, cigarettes, etc. I feel that most people would eat the food not sell it.

Stormfeather
11-13-2013, 06:26 PM
I remember many a day fixing grilled cheese sandwiches with that good ole gubmint cheeze! I have to admit, I make the worlds best grilled cheese now because of that, I have it down to an art form! I miss those days, wish they would go back to them, handing out food supplies instead of food stamps!

MegaCPC
11-13-2013, 11:04 PM
I agree with Possom, I wish the Government would hand out food rather than food stamps that are sold for alcohol, cigarettes, etc. I feel that most people would eat the food not sell it.

x2.

It bugs the shit out of me watching a mother of 8 kids come through the checkout line and pay for her expensive food with stamps. Then the father (or not) comes through after and buys the booze and the smokes with cash.

greg48
11-14-2013, 03:47 PM
Food Stamp program damm sure should never be tied to farm programs, which are themselves a huge problem.